|
Disease
May 13, 2006 12:11:19 GMT -5
Post by Britney on May 13, 2006 12:11:19 GMT -5
|
|
|
Disease
May 13, 2006 12:25:10 GMT -5
Post by darkhelmet on May 13, 2006 12:25:10 GMT -5
AIDS. I'm repulsive enough as it is, y'know... Cancer would be awful too, but you have a better chance, and it's not "your fault" per se, like AIDS is.
|
|
|
Disease
May 13, 2006 13:15:21 GMT -5
Post by morty14 on May 13, 2006 13:15:21 GMT -5
AIDS cause there is no chance (well, minus a medical breakthrough) of recovery or remission.
|
|
|
Disease
May 13, 2006 13:27:06 GMT -5
Post by Hunessai on May 13, 2006 13:27:06 GMT -5
AIDS cause there is no chance (well, minus a medical breakthrough) of recovery or remission. Same, and I wouldn't be responsible for spreading it to others.
|
|
|
Disease
May 13, 2006 14:19:31 GMT -5
Post by Slipper Eater on May 13, 2006 14:19:31 GMT -5
AIDs. Not that I mind the effect it has on me, but more for the fact I'd probably pass it on.
|
|
|
Disease
May 13, 2006 15:21:38 GMT -5
Post by Samurai Slayer on May 13, 2006 15:21:38 GMT -5
I have a friend with cancer (leukemia) and a friend with heart disease, and neither seem to have huge problems with them, atm, so I'd go with AIDS.
|
|
|
Disease
May 13, 2006 22:16:32 GMT -5
Post by ExtraCheeZ on May 13, 2006 22:16:32 GMT -5
AIDs, the only reason is the lack of cure...
I mean, heart desease and cancer are majoritly caused by the patients own actions just like AIDs and in some cases is easier to avoid.
|
|
|
Disease
May 13, 2006 23:19:13 GMT -5
Post by lulu on May 13, 2006 23:19:13 GMT -5
I already have heart trouble, it's easy to bear with I guess. AIDs can be suppressed for decades with proper treatment. Cancer is well, an abnormality of genetic code and can't really be suppressed or cured in some forms, like lukemia and bone marrow cancer.
|
|
|
Disease
May 14, 2006 1:43:43 GMT -5
Post by ExtraCheeZ on May 14, 2006 1:43:43 GMT -5
Cancer can be treated by killing the mutated cells and the mutations are usualy caused by environmental and lifestyle factors (I say "usualy" as we know the greatest cause of cancer is smoking, then there are things like skin cancer from the sun which are all easily avoidable). As for aids, u get it from having sex and lets face it, its not like everyone who has sex gets themselves tested for aids every day or anything. Then it comes to the treatment, when you say AIDs can be "suppressed" that doesnt mean you are going to be mr. perfect 24/7 you still have an extremely dangerouse desease which can kill you any time you catch a common cold. Not to mention the social stigmata of having something like AIDs.
|
|
|
Disease
May 14, 2006 1:54:17 GMT -5
Post by ShadowLynx on May 14, 2006 1:54:17 GMT -5
AIDs sucks...
You have to be under constant securance to keep germs away...
|
|
|
Disease
May 14, 2006 3:27:22 GMT -5
Post by lulu on May 14, 2006 3:27:22 GMT -5
Killing the mutated cells involves kemo (sp?) treatments and the kemo treatments don't help as much as they hurt. I know this from experience cuz my dad has lung cancer. His doctors told him not to go through with the kemo cuz it would deteriorate him faster and harder than his cancer would.
|
|
|
Disease
May 14, 2006 11:32:03 GMT -5
Post by TheStranger on May 14, 2006 11:32:03 GMT -5
Granted, it was only benign, but cancer, i've been there. And heart troubles be in the family so i'll be there, but I certainly do not want AIDS.
|
|
mastab
Gallant
Orgasmic Flooding
Free hugs!
Posts: 2,781
|
Disease
May 14, 2006 20:45:06 GMT -5
Post by mastab on May 14, 2006 20:45:06 GMT -5
AIDS has no chance of being survived(although I know people who have lived with it for 30 years). There's a small chance you can live through the others.
|
|
|
Disease
May 14, 2006 23:07:43 GMT -5
Post by Britney on May 14, 2006 23:07:43 GMT -5
wow only one other vote for cancer!? I would have figured cancer was the most popular option... I mean, all three are deadly, but I would much rather not live having something like cancer growing on me... AIDS wouldn't be as bad... you'd basically have an excuse for people to leave you alone! Living with it still wouldn't be as nasty as living with cancer in my opinion though...
|
|
|
Disease
May 15, 2006 0:07:15 GMT -5
Post by lulu on May 15, 2006 0:07:15 GMT -5
wow only one other vote for cancer!? I would have figured cancer was the most popular option... I mean, all three are deadly, but I would much rather not live having something like cancer growing on me... AIDS wouldn't be as bad... you'd basically have an excuse for people to leave you alone! Living with it still wouldn't be as nasty as living with cancer in my opinion though... Cancer is usually the most painful...
|
|
|
Disease
May 16, 2006 2:08:57 GMT -5
Post by ShadowLynx on May 16, 2006 2:08:57 GMT -5
Cancer is usually the most painful...[/quote]
Depends...
AIDs means you have to live really carefully...
And heart problems... You have blocked arteries and stuff...
|
|